<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google out with a Confession for its Minus 60 Penalty?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagetraffic.com/seo-blog/is-google-out-with-a-confession-for-its-minus-60-penalty/4527/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagetraffic.com/seo-blog/is-google-out-with-a-confession-for-its-minus-60-penalty/4527/</link>
	<description>Search engine news, SEO Tips, Google updates, SEO articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Professional SEO Company</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetraffic.com/seo-blog/is-google-out-with-a-confession-for-its-minus-60-penalty/4527/comment-page-1/#comment-348637</link>
		<dc:creator>Professional SEO Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficblog.com/is-google-out-with-a-confession-for-its-minus-60-penalty/4527/#comment-348637</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s my first time to hear this -60 penalty. i think those black hat seo should be penalize by this..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s my first time to hear this -60 penalty. i think those black hat seo should be penalize by this..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadisonSEO</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetraffic.com/seo-blog/is-google-out-with-a-confession-for-its-minus-60-penalty/4527/comment-page-1/#comment-348633</link>
		<dc:creator>MadisonSEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficblog.com/is-google-out-with-a-confession-for-its-minus-60-penalty/4527/#comment-348633</guid>
		<description>I have been hit by this infamous -60 penalty.

I was number one for a semi-competitive term that certainly brought in orders for onver 1 year. I then was given site links in early Feb. About two weeks ago, I dropped mysteriously to number 61, and my &quot;site links&quot; still showed up!

I found some dup content on my site due to &quot;scrappers&quot; I fixed that up and added some fresh new content as well. 

I don;t have ANY PAID LINKS, now I may have some links from other domains I own, but it should be undetectable to Google (different Class C&#039;s, registrar names, layout, content etc.) they are also related links that I feel should be linked to one other for my customers.

What are all of the factors you or others have concluded cause the -60 drop?

MadisonSEO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been hit by this infamous -60 penalty.</p>
<p>I was number one for a semi-competitive term that certainly brought in orders for onver 1 year. I then was given site links in early Feb. About two weeks ago, I dropped mysteriously to number 61, and my &#034;site links&#034; still showed up!</p>
<p>I found some dup content on my site due to &#034;scrappers&#034; I fixed that up and added some fresh new content as well. </p>
<p>I don;t have ANY PAID LINKS, now I may have some links from other domains I own, but it should be undetectable to Google (different Class C&#039;s, registrar names, layout, content etc.) they are also related links that I feel should be linked to one other for my customers.</p>
<p>What are all of the factors you or others have concluded cause the -60 drop?</p>
<p>MadisonSEO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->